Hala na ul.Felińskiego 15, Boisko A -
półfinał B2
UNIWERSYTET CIVITAS
3
0
VS
(20:10, 20:18, 20:18)
STEPSTONE
Game report
| 23/51 | ATTACK | 13/60 |
| 3 | BLOCK | 5 |
| 7/47 | SERVE | 6/48 |
| 27 | OPP. ERRORS | 22 |
| 60 | TOTAL | 46 |
Best players
MVP
Antoni Pyzel
UNIWERSYTET CIVITAS
| PTS | 15 | SP | 3 | PTS/SP | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATTACK | 9 | BLOCK | 2 | SERVE | 4 |
ATTACK%
SERVE%
ATTACK
Andrzej Zubrzycki
UNIWERSYTET CIVITAS
| ATTACK | 12 | SP | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATTACK/SP | 4 | ∑A | 24 |
ATTACK%
SERVE
Michał Sarnecki
STEPSTONE
| SERVE | 5/14 | SP | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| SERVE/SP | 1.67 |
DIFF%
EFFI%
%
BLOCK
Adrian Wieczorek
STEPSTONE
| BLOCK | 2.5 | B1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 3 | B2 | 1 |
| BLOCK/SP | 0.83 |
RECEPTION
Adrian Wieczorek
STEPSTONE
| ∑R | 9 | SP | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ∑R/SP | 3 |
EXACT%
PERF%
EFFI%
%
DIG
Antoni Pyzel
UNIWERSYTET CIVITAS
| DIG | 3 | SP | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIG/SP | 1 | ∑D | 6 |
Stats
UNIWERSYTET CIVITAS
| Player | PTS | SP | A# | A+ | A- | A/ | A= | A% | ∑A | B1 | B2 | S# | S+ | S- | S= | R# | R+ | R0+ | R0- | R= | R EXACT% | R PERF% | D+ | D- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antoni Pyzel | 15 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 47 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 60 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrzej Zubrzycki | 13 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 50 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Bohdan Kurstny | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 56 | 22 | 2 | 0 |
| Nikodem Ćwikła | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 25 | 13 | 1 | 1 |
STEPSTONE
| Player | PTS | SP | A# | A+ | A- | A/ | A= | A% | ∑A | B1 | B2 | S# | S+ | S- | S= | R# | R+ | R0+ | R0- | R= | R EXACT% | R PERF% | D+ | D- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michał Sarnecki | 10 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 55 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Adrian Wieczorek | 8.5 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 32 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 78 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Marek Charkiewicz | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 60 | 40 | 1 | 0 |
| Aleksandra Zmuda | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 50 | 25 | 1 | 2 |
| Witold Tkaczyk | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 38 | 13 | 1 | 0 |
| Krzysztof Liszewski | 0.5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Glossary Terms
| PTS: | Points |
| SP: | Sets played |
| EXACT%: | ((Very good receptions + Positive receptions)/all receptions)*100% |
| PERF%: | ((Very good receptions)/all receptions)*100% |
| A# | Point attacks |
| A+: | Positive attacks (continuations of actions, after which your team was able to resume the attack) |
| A-: | Negative attacks (ineffective attacks, after which the opposing team was able to lead the attack) |
| A/: | Attacks blocked (loss of point) |
| A=: | Attack errors (loss of point) |
| S# | Point services |
| S+: | Positive services (after which the opposing team gives the ball for free) |
| S-: | Zero services (after which the opposing team derives its own action) |
| S=: | Service errors (loss of point) |
| B1 | Block solos |
| B2: | Block assists |
| R# | Very good receptions (high parabola of the ball, the setter is able to play all types of the set from the jump) |
| R+: | Positive receptions (high parabola of the ball, the setter is able to play all kinds of the set) |
| R0+: | Plus receptions (the setter is not able to play short, he/she has the ability to set the ball to the wing) |
| R0-: | Negative receptions (the result is putting the ball for free on the opponent's side) |
| R=: | Reception errors (The loss of the point) |
| D+: | Effective dig (after which it is possible to launch an attack) |
| D-: | Dig keep (keeping the ball in the game without the possibility of an attack) |