Game summary

Hala na ul.Felińskiego 15, Boisko B -

5 vs 8

INGRAM TEAM
3
0
VS
(20:15, 20:14, 21:20)
Share
PROJEKT II
Game report
30/60 ATTACK 25/54
5 BLOCK 3
1/58 SERVE 2/51
25 OPP. ERRORS 19
61 TOTAL 49
50

ATTACK%

2

SERVE%

46

ATTACK%

4

SERVE%

Best players
MVP

Maciej Mendak

PROJEKT II


PTS 14 SP 3 PTS/SP 4.67
ATTACK 12 BLOCK 1 SERVE 1

ATTACK%

41.38

SERVE%

10
ATTACK

Michał Mendak

PROJEKT II


ATTACK 3 SP 3
ATTACK/SP 1 ∑A 4

ATTACK%

75
SERVE

Arkadiusz Mróz

INGRAM TEAM


SERVE 1/9 SP 3
SERVE/SP 0.33

DIFF%

11.11

EFFI%

-11.11

%

11.11
BLOCK

Arkadiusz Mróz

INGRAM TEAM


BLOCK 3 B1 2
SP 3 B2 2
BLOCK/SP 1
RECEPTION

Marcin Bobel

INGRAM TEAM


∑R 5 SP 2
∑R/SP 2.5

EXACT%

80

PERF%

0

EFFI%

80

%

80
DIG

Michał Mendak

PROJEKT II


DIG 4 SP 3
DIG/SP 1.33 ∑D 5
Stats
INGRAM TEAM
Player PTS SP A# A+ A- A/ A= A% ∑A B1 B2 S# S+ S- S= R# R+ R0+ R0- R= R EXACT% R PERF% D+ D-
Szymon Stańczyk 9 3 9 3 1 1 2 56 16 0 0 0 2 9 1 0 3 4 0 0 43 0 0 0
Arkadiusz Mróz 9 3 5 2 4 1 3 33 15 2 2 1 0 6 2 0 6 4 0 0 60 0 3 0
Artur Sobecki 8 3 8 1 2 0 0 73 11 0 0 0 1 8 3 0 2 8 1 2 15 0 1 0
Marcin Bobel 5.5 2 4 3 1 1 0 44 9 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 80 0 1 0
Adam Bala 3 2 3 2 2 0 1 38 8 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
Kamil Rytel 1.5 2 1 0 0 0 0 100 1 0 1 0 1 8 0 0 1 4 0 0 20 0 1 0
Klaudia Kowalczyk 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 1 0 0 50 0 1 0
PROJEKT II
Player PTS SP A# A+ A- A/ A= A% ∑A B1 B2 S# S+ S- S= R# R+ R0+ R0- R= R EXACT% R PERF% D+ D-
Maciej Mendak 14 3 12 3 4 5 5 41 29 1 0 1 1 8 0 1 3 8 0 0 33 8 3 0
Adrian Kowalski 11 3 10 2 3 0 4 53 19 0 0 1 0 6 3 0 3 6 0 0 33 0 0 1
Michał Mendak 5 3 3 0 0 0 1 75 4 2 0 0 0 9 1 0 6 8 2 0 38 0 4 1
Jarosław Sadowski 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 2 8 3 1 14 0 2 0
Małgorzata Łęcka-Warchoł 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Glossary Terms
PTS: Points
SP: Sets played
EXACT%: ((Very good receptions + Positive receptions)/all receptions)*100%
PERF%: ((Very good receptions)/all receptions)*100%
A# Point attacks
A+: Positive attacks (continuations of actions, after which your team was able to resume the attack)
A-: Negative attacks (ineffective attacks, after which the opposing team was able to lead the attack)
A/: Attacks blocked (loss of point)
A=: Attack errors (loss of point)
S# Point services
S+: Positive services (after which the opposing team gives the ball for free)
S-: Zero services (after which the opposing team derives its own action)
S=: Service errors (loss of point)
B1 Block solos
B2: Block assists
R# Very good receptions (high parabola of the ball, the setter is able to play all types of the set from the jump)
R+: Positive receptions (high parabola of the ball, the setter is able to play all kinds of the set)
R0+: Plus receptions (the setter is not able to play short, he/she has the ability to set the ball to the wing)
R0-: Negative receptions (the result is putting the ball for free on the opponent's side)
R=: Reception errors (The loss of the point)
D+: Effective dig (after which it is possible to launch an attack)
D-: Dig keep (keeping the ball in the game without the possibility of an attack)